A Catholic MP, Carol Monaghan, appeared at a committee meeting on Ash Wednesday with a cross on her forehead.
She had, of course, been to
Mass and in common with thousands of other Catholics that day, including
me, had received the ashes.
My reaction when I saw it was to admire the precision of her priest
in producing so unmistakable a cross. I usually end up with a smudge,
prompting kind souls to tell me that I have a mark on my brow and asking
if I need a tissue to wipe it off.
The reaction of the ignoramuses at the BBC was rather different, and
that mighty corporation asked on Facebook if it was “appropriate” for an
MP to appear in committee with a cross on her forehead. Can anybody
seriously imagine the BBC asking if it was appropriate for a Muslim to
appear wearing a hijab, or a Sikh a turban?
Of course the Beeb wouldn’t do that, because it might give offence to
other faiths – but apparently it is free to offend Christians. Every
phobia is a crime except Christianophobia.
Nevertheless, I suspect the
cause here to have been less prejudice than ignorance, because religious
literacy is at an all-time low in this country and sometimes the
consequences go well beyond merely causing offence.
The Institute of St Anselm in Margate offers courses for religious
leaders from all over the world and is now being driven by that same
ignorance to relocate to Rome.
Presumably that is bad luck for poor old
Margate which, like many seaside resorts in this country, is struggling
financially. Local employees will lose their jobs and nearby providers
of food and beverages will lose custom.
St Anselm’s has been driven out by a failure of understanding in the
Home Office of religious life. Officials seem unable to comprehend that,
for example, African nuns do not have bank accounts and Catholic
priests cannot adduce wives and families as evidence of an incentive to
return home after their studies.
One would think the Home Office would want to hold up St Anselm’s as a
shining example of probity, because 100 per cent of its students do
complete their courses and return home; but instead it has removed that
college’s Tier 4 status (which enables institutions to take in over-16s
on student visas).
The reason given is that revocation is automatic
following the refusal of more than 10 per cent of visa applications. Yet
the applications have been refused on the spurious grounds given above.
So St Anselm’s is off to Rome, Margate is the poorer and officials at
the Home Office continue in blissful ignorance of the lives of those
who apply to it for permission to undertake a short course.
expect them to be able to list the offices in monasteries from Lauds to
Compline, but I do expect them to have some general knowledge.
When I was an employment minister, I had to deal with the utter
inability of some local offices to understand why vicars were suddenly
appearing at their counters, homeless and wageless.
It was, of course,
following the exodus from the Cof E over the ordination of women. The
confusion caused me both irritation and amusement but at least I
The Apostolic Succession does not feature in Jobcentre
Expecting nuns and priests to satisfy financial thresholds designed
for people who are self-sufficient is of a quite different order of
ignorance and is inexcusable.
St Anselm’s itself undertook
responsibility for them so it is that institution’s record which should
have been the salient factor.
Some fairly significant people are writing to Amber Rudd, but if the
letters are opened by people in her department who think Christmas is
about Santa Claus and Easter about chocolate eggs then it is unlikely
she will see them before St Anselm’s has gone to live in a
Survey after survey reveals astounding lack of even the most basic
One found, a few years ago, that a third of all
children think Easter is about Easter Bunny’s birthday.
Fewer than half
knew its actual meaning. Children from the other half grow into adults
who take jobs in the Home Office, social services and teaching.
This is a Christian country whose history and literary heritage have
been shaped by the Church. Surely it is not too much to ask that there
be a basic grasp of Christian teaching, significant festivals and common
practices, especially in major organisations such as the Home Office
and the BBC?
Is it appropriate, to use the BBC’s own phrase, to have people
passing judgments on visa applications or commenting on religious
practice who do not have the most basic grasp of religious reality?